Gov’t Spy on Social Media: What It Means For Your Privacy

In the age of digital dominance, our daily lives are intertwined with social media platforms, messaging apps, and various forms of online communication.

While these platforms offer unprecedented convenience and connectivity, they also present a growing concern: government surveillance.

Across the globe, governments have increasingly relied on monitoring social media as a tool for curbing dissent, maintaining control, and enhancing security measures. This practice, however, raises significant questions about the balance between national security and the right to privacy.

Triangulation and Silencing of Dissent

In Kenya, allegations have surfaced that the government utilizes mobile network giants, particularly Safaricom, to track and silence dissenting voices. Reports claim that Safaricom triangulation is a preferred method of surveillance, where the government allegedly uses the mobile network’s infrastructure to track the movements and communication of individuals suspected of engaging in anti-government activities.

Triangulation technology allows authorities to determine the physical location of a phone by measuring the signal strength between multiple cell towers. The method is used to determine the location of a mobile phone by utilizing signals from multiple nearby cell towers.

When a mobile phone is active, it continually communicates with the nearest cell towers to maintain a connection with the network. The strength or timing of the signal between the phone and these towers can be measured to estimate the phone’s location.

By comparing the distance from the phone to at least three cell towers, triangulation can calculate the phone’s position.This process works by estimating the distance between the phone and the towers based on signal strength or the time it takes for the signal to travel between the phone and the towers, a method known as Time of Arrival (TOA).

Once the distances are estimated, circles are drawn around each tower, where the radius represents the phone’s estimated distance from that tower. The location of the phone is identified at the point where the circles intersect.
It is a method that has proven effective in tracking people without the need for GPS, raising serious concerns about the extent of government oversight of private communication.

Crackdown on Dissent in Kenya

In recent times, activists, journalists, and opposition figures have claimed that their phone calls and social media accounts are being monitored, especially during election periods or times of heightened political tension.
This similar came into play during the recent gen-z demonstrations where descenting voices would be rounded up and disappeared through technology.

The online space, which once promised a degree of anonymity and freedom, is becoming an extension of the state’s surveillance apparatus. It has left many Kenyans wary of expressing their views openly on platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp, fearing potential reprisal. This has led to arrests, disappearances, and in some cases, slowed internet speeds to curb the spread of dissent.

Telegram CEO Arrest in France

The concern over government surveillance of social media is not confined to Kenya. In a more recent development, Pavel Durov, the CEO of Telegram, was arrested in France after refusing to comply with authorities’ demands to provide backend access to the popular messaging app.

Telegram, a platform that prides itself on its encryption and privacy features, has become a refuge for individuals seeking to communicate without government oversight. Its security nature makes it appealing to activists, journalists, and anyone wanting to maintain the confidentiality of their conversations.

French authorities allege that Telegram has been used to coordinate various illegal activities, including extremist plots, and they have pushed for backend access to monitor these conversations.

Durov’s arrest marks a significant escalation in the ongoing battle between governments seeking more control over digital platforms and tech companies determined to protect user privacy.

This incident raises broader questions about where the line should be drawn between public safety and personal privacy. Governments argue that access to encrypted communication is necessary to combat terrorism, organized crime, and cyber threats. However, critics maintain that such access could be used to stifle freedom of speech, suppress political opposition, and ultimately, erode civil liberties.

What This Means for Privacy

The convergence of these two stories – the use of Safaricom triangulation in Kenya and the arrest of Telegram’s CEO – highlights the increasing lengths to which governments are willing to go in their bid to monitor citizens.
The implications for privacy are profound.

In Kenya, surveillance tactics, such as mobile triangulation and social media monitoring, suggest that the state can track individuals’ movements and communications with ease, even without consent.

This reality poses a significant threat to freedom of expression, as citizens may feel forced to self-censor their opinions to avoid being targeted by the government.

Globally, the arrest of Durov and the pressure on tech companies to provide backend access raise concerns about the future of encrypted communication.

Telegram has said it will now hand over users’ IP addresses and phone numbers to authorities who have search warrants or other valid legal requests, a move that has further thrown privacy into jeopardy. The change to its terms of service and privacy policy “should discourage criminals”, CEO Durov said in a Telegram post.

“While 99.999% of Telegram users have nothing to do with crime, the 0.001% involved in illicit activities create a bad image for the entire platform, putting the interests of our almost billion users at risk,” he continued.

The announcement marks a significant reversal for Durov, the platform’s Russian-born co-founder who was detained by French authorities last month at an airport just north of Paris.

Also read: Why Regulation Of Content Creation Is Good For The Industry

If governments are successful in their efforts to weaken encryption, the digital privacy that many users have come to rely on could disappear.

The risk of surveillance extends far beyond the monitoring of criminals; it could become a tool to control citizens and limit their freedoms. While security is undeniably important, there is a pressing need for a balance that protects both national interests and individual privacy.

As governments worldwide ramp up their digital surveillance efforts, citizens must remain vigilant, demanding transparency and accountability from both their leaders and the corporations that manage the platforms they use every day.

The delicate dance between security and privacy will likely continue to evolve, but personal freedoms mustn’t be sacrificed in the name of safety.